Responding to Findings and Gaps
      Back to home
      1. Trustero Support
      2. Phase 5: During the Audit
      3. Responding to Findings and Gaps

      Responding to Audit Findings and Gaps

      Turning Audit Issues into Opportunities for Compliance Improvement

      Introduction & Purpose

      Audit findings are a normal part of any compliance program. Whether they point to true control gaps or result from misunderstandings, how your organization responds makes all the difference. A clear, well-documented response process builds trust with auditors, demonstrates operational maturity, and supports continuous improvement.

      This guide is intended for compliance, risk, and audit leaders looking to shape an effective response strategy. It covers how to assess findings, clarify intent, document your position, and implement corrective actions in a way that supports both audit outcomes and long-term compliance goals.

      If you're preparing to engage with auditors or reviewing post-audit feedback, this guidance will help you turn potential issues into meaningful opportunities for assurance and improvement.

      Key Concept & Context

      Audit findings typically reflect one of the following:

      • Misunderstandings about your controls, documentation, or technology.
      • True control gaps or process weaknesses that need remediation.

      Auditors bring expertise, but they may not always grasp the nuances of your environment. A tactful, clear response helps clarify intent and build credibility. Most importantly, it shows that your compliance program is built on continuous improvement, not just reactive fixes.

      Framework-specific differences also matter:

      • SOC 2 uses the term exceptions.
      • ISO 27001 uses non-conformities.
      • HIPAA, HITRUST, and others often take a risk-based view of findings.

      Practical Guidance

      A. Acknowledge and Assess Findings Promptly

      • Acknowledge the issue without defensiveness.
      • Assess the context and determine if the finding is valid or the result of a misunderstanding.
      • Review the supporting evidence and clarify intent, control design, and expected outcome.

      Use Trustero to revisit control descriptions, evidence attachments, and testing history to support your review.

      B. Communicate Clearly and Professionally

      • Start a constructive dialogue with your auditor to clarify any misinterpretation.
      • Use the opportunity to explain how the control works, not just what’s written.
      • Be transparent. Auditors respect thoughtful engagement more than defensive pushback.

      In Trustero, use control notes or attach supporting materials that weren’t included during initial review.

      C. Document a Formal Response

      • Prepare a management response that includes:
        • A summary of your position.
        • The results of your internal assessment.
        • Planned or completed corrective actions.
      • Tailor your response to the audit framework’s format and tone.

      Export evidence and control activity history from Trustero to support your formal response.

      D. Implement and Track Corrective Actions

      • Create a realistic remediation plan with timelines and responsible owners.
      • Align actions with best practices, not just audit demands.
      • Update relevant policies, procedures, or control descriptions.

      Use Jira or your integrated project tracker to manage remediation. Trustero can link findings to action items for traceability.

      E. Monitor and Follow Up

      • Reassess the control after corrective actions are complete.
      • Validate effectiveness and document follow-up testing.
      • Provide auditors with updates or confirmation that the issue has been resolved.

      Trustero’s compliance dashboard helps track remediation progress and reassessment outcomes.

      Framework-Specific Notes

      SOC 2

      • Findings are recorded as exceptions in the audit report.
      • Management can include a formal response in the final report.
      • Clearly outline what actions have been taken or will be taken to prevent recurrence.

      ISO 27001

      • Findings are categorized as minor or major non-conformities.
      • Major non-conformities may pause or conditionally suspend certification.
      • You must address and close the issue within a defined timeframe to maintain certification.

      HIPAA, HITRUST, and Risk-Based Frameworks

      • These frameworks encourage a risk-based response to findings.
      • The focus is on reducing residual risk rather than meeting strict control checklists.
      • Documenting how you identified, assessed, and treated the risk is often sufficient for auditors.

      Conclusion

      Responding to audit findings is about more than resolving individual issues. It reflects your organization’s overall compliance posture and governance maturity. By handling findings with professionalism, clear documentation, and a commitment to continuous improvement, you build trust with auditors and strengthen your internal compliance processes.

      A strong response process helps turn findings into forward progress by reducing future audit friction and increasing assurance for both internal and external stakeholders.